They Call This a Study???
The standards of “medical research” in the modern age may very well have sunk to a new low, thanks to the drug war.
Looking at the methodology of the following study, we noticed it is based on the “self-reporting” of a group of only 12 individuals.
Source: Johns Hopkins Medicine
Released: Thu 24-Jan-2008, 12:20 ET
Marijuana Withdrawal as Bad as Withdrawal from CigarettesDescription
Research by a group of scientists studying the effects of heavy marijuana use suggests that withdrawal from the use of marijuana is similar to what is experienced by people when they quit smoking cigarettes. Abstinence from each of these drugs appears to cause several common symptoms, such as irritability, anger and trouble sleeping - based on self reporting in a recent study of 12 heavy users of both marijuana and cigarettes.Newswise — Research by a group of scientists studying the effects of heavy marijuana use suggests that withdrawal from the use of marijuana is similar to what is experienced by people when they quit smoking cigarettes. Abstinence from each of these drugs appears to cause several common symptoms, such as irritability, anger and trouble sleeping - based on self reporting in a recent study of 12 heavy users of both marijuana and cigarettes.
“These results indicate that some marijuana users experience withdrawal effects when they try to quit, and that these effects should be considered by clinicians treating people with problems related to heavy marijuana use,” says lead investigator in the study, Ryan Vandrey, Ph.D., of the Department of Psychiatry at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States. Admissions in substance abuse treatment facilities in which marijuana was the primary problem substance have more than doubled since the early 1990s and now rank similar to cocaine and heroin with respect to total number of yearly treatment episodes in the United States, says Vandrey.
He points out that a lack of data, until recently, has led to cannabis withdrawal symptoms not being characterized or included in medical reference literature such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, (DSM-IV) or the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10).
Since the drafting of the DSM-IV in 1994, an increasing number of studies have surfaced suggesting that cannabis has significant withdrawal symptoms. What makes Vandrey’s recent study unique is that it is the first study that compares marijuana withdrawal symptoms to withdrawal symptoms that are clinically recognized by the medical community - specifically the tobacco withdrawal syndrome.
“Since tobacco withdrawal symptoms are well documented and included in the DSM-IV and the IDC-10, we can infer from the results of this comparison that marijuana withdrawal is also clinically significant and should be included in these reference materials and considered as a target for improving treatment outcomes,” says Vandrey.
Vandrey added that this is the first “controlled” comparison of the two withdrawal syndromes in that data was obtained using rigorous scientific methods - abstinence from drugs was confirmed objectively, procedures were identical during each abstinence period, and abstinence periods occurred in a random order. That tobacco and marijuana withdrawal symptoms were reported by the same participants, thus eliminating the likelihood that results reflect physiological differences between subjects, is also a strength of the study.
Interestingly, the study also revealed that half of the participants found it easier to abstain from both substances than it was to stop marijuana or tobacco individually, whereas the remaining half had the opposite response.
“Given the general consensus among clinicians that it is harder to quit more than one substance at the same time, these results suggest the need for more research on treatment planning for people who concurrently use more than one drug on a regular basis,” says Vandrey.
Vandrey’s study, which appears in the January issue of the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence, followed six men and six women at the University of Vermont in Burlington and Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., for a total of six weeks. All were over 18 (median age 28.2 years), used marijuana at least 25 days a month and smoked at least 10 cigarettes a day. None of the subjects intended to quit using either substance, did not use any other illicit drugs in the prior month, were not on any psychotropic medication, did not have a psychiatric disorder, and if female, were not pregnant.
For the first week, participants maintained their normal use of cigarettes and marijuana. For the remaining five weeks, they were randomly chosen to refrain from using either cigarettes, marijuana or both substances for five-day periods separated by nine-day periods of normal use. In order to confirm abstinence, patients were given daily quantitative urine toxicology tests of tobacco and marijuana metabolites.
Withdrawal symptoms were self reported on a daily basis Monday through Friday using a withdrawal symptom checklist that listed scores for aggression, anger, appetite change, depressed mood, irritability, anxiety/nervousness, restlessness, sleep difficulty, strange dreams and other, less common withdrawal symptoms. Patients also provided an overall score for discomfort they experienced during each abstinence period.
Results showed that overall withdrawal severity associated with marijuana alone and tobacco alone was of similar frequency and intensity. Sleep disturbance seemed to be more pronounced during marijuana abstinence, while some of the general mood effects (anxiety, anger) seemed to be greater during tobacco abstinence. In addition, six of the participants reported that quitting both marijuana and tobacco at the same time was more difficult than quitting either drug alone, whereas the remaining six found that it was easier to quit marijuana or cigarettes individually than it was to abstain from the two substances simultaneously.
Vandrey recognizes that the small sample size is a limitation in this study, but the results are consistent with other studies indicating that marijuana withdrawal effects are clinically important.
This study was conducted while Vandrey was a doctoral candidate at the University of Vermont. It was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Other researchers who contributed to this study are Alan Budney, Ph.D., of the University of Arkansas for Medical Studies, Little Rock; John Hughes, M.D., of the University of Vermont; and Anthony Ligouri, Ph.D., of Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
© 2008 Newswise. All Rights Reserved.
Apparently, the doctors - Budney, Ligouri, and Hughes - decided that they needed to study a number that’s larger than what one of them could count on their fingers . . .
Sadly, we’d also surmise that one of the doctors had a problem with foot odor, however, and after removing a shoe and sock to begin counting the next “flurry” of reports, his cohorts decided to cut things short before their olfactory senses were further assaulted . . .
Please don’t be fooled by what we are calling “pseudo-science” . . . Nicotine addiction is a real bitch . . . cannabis is not physically addicting.
Tags: cannabis, cocaine, heroin, marijuana, medicine, news, pseudoscience, smoking, tobacco, UTube
rvandrey said
January 25 2008 @ 11:13 am
As the author of the paper I feel like I should at least comment on your take of my research so others are not similarly confused. First by saying that this absolutely is science. I’m not sure why you chose to emphasize that the study is based on participant “self-reports”. How else would you expect people to indicate how they are feeling? If you would like to read the actual research report, rather than just the press release, I will be happy to send it to you.
While there were only 12 participants in this study, we and others have repeatedly demonstrated in several controlled studies involving hundreds of study participants that a reliable and valid withdrawal syndrome does occur in SOME heavy marijuana users when they quit abruptly. We readily acknowledge that MOST people who use marijuana, whether for medical or recreational reasons, have not such problems. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that some do and it is very difficult for them to quit.
I will close by attaching comments I received via e-mail this morning in response to the article from someone who just quit long-term daily use of marijuana and tobacco. “I’ve been up since 3, and its been this way for weeks, lots of sweating at night, vivid dreams and so on. Major sleep deprivation that I treat by sleeping 2x per day for 3 hours + small naps and 10 km daily jog with heavy workout. Very rough. I am 44 years old, and the habits have been going on for years. Apart from lack of sleep, and hunger cravings, there is also sudden onset of constipation. This is actually the most distressing aspect, for me at least. I have tried to quit many times, sometimes only cigarettes, other times only cannabis. Any hard-core smoker will say the two go together and they just aren’t the same on their own.”
Your interest in research related to marijuana and that you share this type of thing on a public forum is great. In most cases I would leave your comments alone, but I have to admit I take some offense to being told my research represents a “new low” for medical research…
admin said
January 26 2008 @ 10:24 am
Thank you for your comment. We are actually impressed that you took the time to visit our blog and comment on our “take” on the media coverage of your report. That doesn’t mean we’re going to back away from our position, because we believe we are defending the truth, and we honestly feel you are distorting reality at the behest of individuals intent on furthering the misguided war on drugs.
When we are confronted by stories in the media that report the exact opposite of our personal experience, we can’t help but wonder who’s trying to fool whom. Let’s start with OUR personal experience here at the “bird’s nest”, and BTW - please feel free to add this “self reporting” to your study - if you dare!! Here’s a testimonial . . .
I’ve quit smoking marijuana before, after extremely heavy use, and I’ve quit smoking cigarettes after 15 years of 1+ pack a day use. I can tell you from my experience that there’s no comparison. Nicotine causes clear physical addiction, by the classic definition of the term “addiction” - it’s as addictive as heroin or cocaine in every study we’ve seen, some state it’s more addicting.
Cannabis, in some instances, can cause a psychological dependency, which is clearly different from a physical addiction. The fact that cannabis / THC primary active components are fat soluble, the likelihood of any true physical withdrawal symptoms are actually pretty remote, a regular cannabis user will test positive for more than a month after quitting all use. There’s no “withdrawal” as there might be with physically addicting drugs like heroin, nicotine, or even caffeine.
FOGHORN
In the end, with all due respect sir, we think “science” is not well served by individuals willing to report what the government wants to hear. We believe your study is PSEUDOSCIENCE - and we can’t believe anyone with a PhD would even dare defend a study based on the experience of a mere 12 people. There are three people here at the “bird’s nest” who can report experiences quite different from what your study attempts to portray as “truth”.
As we said before, when we are confronted by stories in the media that report the exact opposite of our personal experience, we can’t help but wonder who’s trying to fool whom.
We won’t get fooled again, but then again, we aren’t getting paid tax dollars to produce evidence that forwards a misguided governmental policy. No sir, that’s a description of you! If our article was insulting to you sir, it’s because it was meant to be, it’s our opinion that individuals who report pseudoscience actually sacrifice their professional integrity on the alter of a dark Goddess.
Again we’ll ask that you expand your study to include 15 individuals, and report that a large percentage of heavy smokers of both pot and marijuana also report an extreme difference in effect when quitting either tobacco or cannabis - the difference is like night and day.
Please feel free use our experience to amend your study - call it “self reporting” - if you will. Considering that the experience of the 3 individuals here actually represents a 25% proportion of your original pool, could it do anything but help improve your accuracy
And come visit a few cannabis message boards and you’ll find hundreds of people who could report experiences similar to ours. Take a little time to do a real survey sir, and we’re quite positive you’ll be foreced to report different results!
stepping on toes . . . again | Cannabis Chronicles said
January 26 2008 @ 10:31 am
[...] 25 2008 @ 11:13 am · [...]